/lit/ - Literature

>>18692956
Thank you for your thoughtful answer. What I get from it is that one’s own episteme can be unconscious and implicit in his discourse, therefore one doesn’t have to express it beforehand – am I right? If so, why do I feel like I don’t have a specific episteme, despite the fact that I so often meditate on these problems? I wouldn’t say that I’m not conscious of my cognitive process – or, better, not conscious that a cognitive process takes place in me – but I am not able to describe it in a unique way, basing it on univocal fixed principles. No theory seems to satisfy me, because the opposite theory will always sound equally right. What does this all mean? Can there be a legitimate position consisting in the deliberate discard of all epistemological positions on the basis of the idea that all of them are equally acceptable?