/lit/ - Literature

All those "PBUH" shit are pathetic and annoying.
Just write the names without any hypocritical apostrophe, it's not as if they would care.

>>6424941
>One could argue the same thing about homosexual sex though, since it has in at least the case of males a higher chance of giving you STDs and HIV/AIDS.

Again that one

>>5765537
>and his records have likely been tampered with.

Of the first mention of Jesus in Josephus' work:
>"The general scholarly view is that while the longer passage, known as the Testimonium Flavianum, is most likely not authentic in its entirety, it is broadly agreed upon that it originally consisted of an authentic nucleus"

Of the second:
>"Of the other mention in Josephus, Josephus scholar Louis H. Feldman has stated that "few have doubted the genuineness" of Josephus' reference to Jesus in Antiquities 20, 9, 1 and it is only disputed by a small number of scholars."

Seriously, why are atheists so intensely focused on trying to prove "Jesus wasn't a real person"? Not only is it blatantly wrong and disagreed with by the vast majority of historical experts, but it's not even a minutely logical or good argument against Christianity.

Some atheists are so butthurt about Christianity that they let it completely cloud any sense of reason at all and they end up making stupid arguments like this.