/lit/ - Literature

>>13444586
That's fair. I found the climax to TUC to be extremely underwhelming. Aurang and Aurax built up for 7 books, dispatched in 3 pages. Shae, nothing. The Dunyain rule the Consult? Zzzzz.

Kellhus's motives are still obscure. Did he make a deal with Ajokli to eventually supplant him? Why make a deal to stop the Consult with maybe the only entity in his universe that makes them look like the teletubbies?

I love everything the man writes, but TUC had its flaws without a doubt. And god I'm tired of Overlook's whining. Rain World, John C. Wright, Second Apocalypse... brilliant, genre-defying works/authors that struggle so hard to find their audience, and they shouldn't have to. It's all so tiresome.

>>13444627
If you're talking about Blake, here are the titles to those papers:

“‘Visibility Should Not Be Visible:’ Blake’s Borders and the Regime of Sight.” The Wordsworth Circle 25 (Winter 1994): 29-36.

“‘The Innocence of Becoming Restored:’ Blake, Nietzsche, and the Disclosure of Difference.” Studies in Romanticism 29.1 (1990): 91-113.


Forget which one it was. Anyways, the author, David Clark, has an extremely verbose but eloquent style. It's a damn shame he's hard to find. Now God himself knows I'm nothing special, but it's nice to be reminded what I brainlet I still am.