[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.3227051 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 160 KB, 1895x815, shh just come.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3227051

>>3227013
I don't think i'm depressed, that is, i've never been diagnosed with it. When I read stuff like Schopenhauer or Camus I just get this feeling of apathy, I just realize nothing matters, but i don't get the following empowerment that existentialism brings some people.

Also, I've gotten into stuff like Wittgenstein and logical positivism. To understand philosophies of science, i think you need to understand how science cannot contain meaning or value.

I'm probably one of the few atheists who'd wish they could believe in God.

>> No.3223900 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 160 KB, 1895x815, shh just come.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3223900

>>3223773
>>3223815
>>3223824

I have become increasingly happier being here on /lit/ because people share more and more of my views. I do not know if this is a good thing since i just strengthen my biased opinions.

I wrote this about Sam Harris in a thread once
>He believes in utilitarianism, although he didn't quite succeed in what he wanted in the Moral Landscape.

And i got the reply

>Yes he did. He didn't set out to prove the existence of objective morality through science. He said that morality exists as a concept to benefit human flourishing, and we can determine certain methods to assist in this though the scientific method.

I agree with a lot of Sam Harris' ideas about human experiences, although he takes the puerile atheism way too far.

everything he said in the Moral Landscape and Free Will was true

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]