/lit/ - Literature

>>11806704
> States his point of view without supporting it.

What step do you disagree with?

>>11735416
Thanks for your advice. I understand where your coming from. Ideally I would write in the modern way, a la Bertrand Russell or somebody, but for whatever reason whenever I set out to, say, write like I talk, I just fall flat on my face. I end up reading a lot of older philosophy (call it poetical philosophy) so this just comes more naturally. But I'll be the first to admit that this wouldn't sway many people. Most would probably give it up or think its satire, as you pointed out. Thanks again, anon

>>11713679
I strongly agree with this sentiment. This board is shit. I started a thread yesterday only for shit posters to try to sink it. Say nothing of the mods.

>>11708481
I think you are right about mythology. Thank you, anon