/lit/ - Literature

>>15683415
>the egoist must be prepared go fight under any flag that suits his interest
And? It's a tautology, this premise does not "cause" nazism any more than me feeling like taking a shit and that a toilet being nearby is convenient, "causes" said shit to be in said toilet. Emergent phenomena are emergent because the actors within it want it to emerge, big whopee. Totally ignores the fact that Stirner subtly argues that total servility to another's cause (eg. to statehood, which fascism lauds to hell and back) can never fully be your own cause, thus mostly uling the kind of authoritarian association-for-itself you find in ideologies and under "flags".

>>14655404
Duh, religion is for the impressionable, naive, and fearful

>>14649183
Guy you're responding to. Belief throws you down a narrow tunnel path, it distorts and falsifies. Ideologues are the most dangerous

>>14649273
This. Ideology is cringe.

>>14643960

Stirner for sure

>>14097968
spooks are a spook

>>13975078
Question remains; is a willful self-spooking for the implementation of collective strategies valid? As it's motivated by a consciously egoistic action does that kind of not kind of break Stirner's political framework altogether. Sure you'd be spooket post-action but surely one could imagine reassuring oneself continuously that it's a desire grounded in oneself?

If awareness of your self-motivated actions is all that's required then I don't see what conscious egoism has to offer for any emancipatory movements as it could just be used to reify the status quo social arrangements.

>>13919156
i hate you and you are gay

>I

hello mr stirner!

>>12891421

Not the guy but from the same table years ago. (Little Black Cart, the guys who published the new Max Stirner Translation)

>At the Seattle Anarchist Bookfair on Saturday, August 26, several anarchists confronted Little Black Cart about their decision to publish and distribute Atassa: Readings in Eco-Extremism.(Book about the ideas of an eco terrorist group)

>After voicing these concerns and being met with smug indifference, one comrade ripped Atassa in half. The LBC tabler responded immediately by grabbing this person by the throat from behind the table, pushing through the table, putting them in a chokehold, and taking them to the ground in an attempt to choke them unconscious.

>A second comrade punched the attacker in the face in an attempt to get them to release the first. In response, an associate of the LBC tabler jumped on the second comrade from behind in defense of the choking attack, taking them to the ground and punching them repeatedly in the head until they were pulled off by bystanders.

>The physical conflict ended after the attackers were pulled off and both parties were told to leave by bookfair organizers, as per the bookfair policy. The comrade who was choked was fine, the one punched suffered a mild concussion.

>Many people in the immediate vicinity had no idea what was going on: all of a sudden, someone was being choked, another was being beaten, and no one really knew why. It was over quickly and people looked on in shock.

>Another LBC tabler, after witnessing the beatdown, expressed outrage about the property destruction when they found out their $7 book had been ripped in half. The person who put the comrade in the chokehold, after complaining about being kicked out because the other side had “started it,” was asked if the book was worth as much as the comrade’s neck and stated “Yeah it is.”

>>12193626
>anarchist
nice spook

>>10758096

did we tread on your private ideology?

>>10025790
>what is mine is mine.
Now read the book and consider what "mine" means.

I know OP was just intentionally spooking around but:

Removing something with any methods does not make you the same than the thing you remove even if the thing is practising the same methods you happened to use to remove it

>>9216926
>he hasn't combined Nietzschism and Egoism to become the true uberman
Heh

>mfw trespassing on private property
>guy yells at me and tells me to get the fuck off his lawn
>tell him that private property is a spook
>he just mumbles under his breath and tells me to get the fuck out of here

I consider my Stirnerposting to be post-ironic, though I don't place much value on it either way.

>>8335932
Does reddit have stirners though?

>>8249672

>Complains about identity politics
>Buys into class politics

>>8197818
Are you actually retarded?
""""Your"""" property?
You can't even prove to me that you exist and you claim to have property?
Shut up, my property.

>>8186183
His argument was built on spooks.
If he was truly exorcized then there would be no need to even write a criticism, because Stirner is right about everything.

>>8182914
stirner didn't believe in private property

>natural rights