/lit/ - Literature

>>23456815
>le cope
You haven't read shit and you know it. You're a pathetic fucking faggot who posts on /lit/ despite not reading books.

>>16047260
>not even that dude but MK is genuinely so poorly written as to be disregarded in its entirety as a fluke of German psychosis at the time
That is a lot of words to not express any real point of logic. If you have an argument against the quality of the text then state such.
inb4: repetition

>15787199
The original statement was intentionally vague to avoid rebuttal of specific facts. It is a classic "spaghetti on the wall" argument.

>>15536403
>We have ample evidence of human remains
You need a soil density anomaly to account for the Auschwitz myth, which is the bulk of the total story.
>Nice goalpost shift though
Your failure to provide adequate proof of a mass grave to support the magnitude of your claims does not constitute a goalpost shift on my part.
>if you deny that the Holocaust happen because of that, you might as well deny world war 1 as well
Are you retarded on purpose? Why even raise that?

>>15323672
>similar to the Fed
Which presidency has been dominated by Jews for ages. You are feeding me bait at this point. it is a total analog to what I have been saying all along. He may not have been open about stating that he desired the organ to be controlled by Jews, but that is the likely outcome.
>he has written a great deal about the form and function of stereotypes
So he may have, but the presence of stereotypes does not negate the presence of genuine patterns.
>but you merely put those words in my mouth by quoting the Wikipedia page
I was not familiar with his work so I read the wiki and that item really caught my eye. I am not going to read the book in real time for you during the thread.
>these word games around "anti-Semitism" are stupid
I agree, but they are jewish games - not mine. If I do not nail the word to the floor then people dance around with it a lot.
>your prejudices are rather evident
I was a philosemite until 2015 when I stated a factual matter and got roundly lambasted for anti-Semitism. My questioning the matter of the gross mischaracterization of what I had stated sent me down this road. What you see as unfair prejudice is my sensitivity to the neglected biases and the repetitive rhetoric through which I have found myself wading ever since my break with the Jews. If you were arguing in good faith then I apologize, but quoting such biased sources and using other rhetorically teetering analogs such as The Fed. make it appear that you are not arguing in good faith but that you are unironically shitposting. Regardless of my bias, shoving another Jew in my face during a discussion that already angles on the Jews only muddies the waters and smacks of shitposting.

>>13622291
>No, I've read it

>nobody refuted me so I must be right
Peak brainlet