/lit/ - Literature

>>19726172
which edition of that book should I get? this one or pic related? only gonna read one to go a general gist of the ideology

>>19726972
based

I'm going fucking insane. An anon on here wrote a brilliant introduction to xenofeminism and accelerationism linked a blog which articulated it amazingly well a while ago and I swear I fucking saved it but it seems to have vanished completely
Anon, are you around? Link that fucking blog or webpage or whatever with all the purple and black visual design and that weird looking picture of the girl with purple hair and sick looking makeup

>>13337479
Xenofeminism

>>13041074
This was kinda' my take as well. The book is only like 40 pages long, and while I can appreciate it's attempt at bringing a kind of accelerationist perspective to people who have literally never read philosophy or political theory before (seemed to be the target audience), the only real praxis it recommended that I can recall was something like 'make communities with likeminded people' and 'be ready to reject the contemporary system as it continues to fail'. Points for being somewhat collapse aware and queerpositive, but there really wasn't anything in there that you couldn't have got from reading one copy of adbusters, and they've been around, saying basically the same stuff, for like 30 years now.

It's like something you would give to your niece if she was getting interested in politics and also a teenager.

I'm going to try reading pic related to see if it goes anywhere or has anything more tangible to offer before I condemn the entire project to the bargin-bin of accelerationist thought, but my hopes aren't exceptionally high. Anyone here read this one?

Capital is sentient, gender is the least of our concerns.