/lit/ - Literature

>>15857481
You can't answer the evidence in front of you so you resort to diversions. The photo above clearly shows that Virginia Roberts, one of the main accusers and financial beneficiaries in this case, was not, as she claims, abused, raped, or trafficked, but was a WILLING prostitute who wanted to fuck powerful men for money.
As to your diversion, the vast, vast majority of the prostitutes employed by Epstein were 16+. As to the few that were not, I suspect they were precocious girls such as pic related (11 years old), who were already sexually developed, and knew very well how to use their nubility to titillate men; and not, as you probably imagine, undeveloped, naive, starry-eyed girls who were lured into Epstein's jet with the promises of Barbie Dolls. So long as the parents and the girls made no objections, there was no "rape, abuse, trafficking, etc." involved, and there was nothing wrong with it except insofar as there is something wrong with prostitution and promiscuity in general.

>>14164713