/lit/ - Literature

>>17594896
>Both denote an unfair distribution of an essential resource as well as an economy based upon unproductive capital.
Which is why we need an LVT to tax the value of land as much as possible while leaving improvements on it completely untaxed.

>>17585971

>>15366939
Henry George.

>>15198302
Get out cringe faggot, /lit/ is a Georgist board. Landlords should actively develop their land so it is more efficient, and idle land bankers need to be taxed to death.

>>15174613
>spends his time lobbying for others to give him images instead of creating them himself

>>14679484
No, you didn't read Henry George carefully enough. He respected the NAP and argued against socialism as he general redistribution of wealth for the sole purpose of ending poverty as unjust. He also believed in the existence of natural hierarchys and that trying to suppress them is a hopeless endeavor.

Although superficially a socialist idea, his intentions and arguments for why land most be equally divided are quite different. Also, I mentioned here >>14675767 why land ownership can currently be considered a NAP violation.

>>14679900

The NAP is strong because it makes as little assumptions as possible. Given no other information or context about a situation or person, I assume violence to be wrong and the incorrect answer.

Just like the maxim is innocent until proven guilty, the NAP is the conviction that we should be non violent as a default.

It is claimed or meant to always lead to the best outcome, as some autistic ancaps will rationalize it would, since I'm sure the innocent until proven guilty has let plenty get away with murder.

However, it is a strong moral principle because it's simple, clear, and only asks you to restrict an action, which is always possible. Furthermore, it allows us to admit our humility and limitlessness in our ability to always judge situations and determine the best course action.