/lit/ - Literature

Let's say one experiences the "calamity" like he did. Essentially factory resets your brain, some sort of disconnect from the mind (or I guess that the illusion of the mind is dissolved). Words lose their weight, one is not bound to any ideological or metaphysical views. He essentially becomes one with the body. What next, just die?

But the problem endangers us, not the planet. Nature can take care of itself. So it is absurd to talk of saving the earth or saving the planet. "We are in danger, not the planet," observes U.G. The problem has to be dealt with realistically in relation to the objective of meeting the basic needs of the population of the planet. He is quick to point out that Hollywood stars are only interested in promoting themselves and not the environment. The lifestyle of these stars is itself a contributing factor to the problem. Similarly, those who write books and articles criticizing the destruction of trees are also contributing to the problem because the paper for their books and articles comes at the expense of those very trees. U.G. does not see any justification for the publication of books in the age of the computer and the video-cassette. And he is absolutely right. U.G. also warns that the cause of the environment, like other religious and political causes, will be used to justify the persecution and destruction of individuals.

STOP THINKING

>>10616562
DROP THE SPIRITUALITY

I REPEAT DROP IT

THIS IS U.G. SPEAKING, GIVE IT UP

THERE IS NO WAY OUT I REPEAT NO WAY OUT

STEP ASIDE, AMATEURS