/lit/ - Literature

I hear their teachings are similar. Is that a true conclusion people reach from studying their teachings as closely as possible, or is that just a thing people who are vaguely spiritual but not religious say to justify their lack of commitment to any specific religion?
Secondly, how good is this book in particular regarding that subject?

I hear their teachings are similar. Is that a true conclusion people reach from studying their teachings as closely as possible, or is that just a thing people who are vaguely spiritual but not religious say to justify their lack of commitment to any specific religion?
Secondly, how good is this book in particular regarding that subject?

I hear their teachings are similar. Is that a true conclusion people reach from studying their teachings as closely as possible, or is that just a thing people who are vaguely spiritual but not religious say to justify their lack of commitment to any specific religion?
Secondly, how good is this book in particular regarding that subject?

I hear their teachings are similar. Is that a true conclusion people reach from studying their teachings as closely as possible, or is that just a thing people who are vaguely spiritual but not religious say to justify their lack of commitment to any specific religion?
Secondly, how good is this book in particular regarding that subject?

>>9897759
They were both revisionist figures for their religious traditions. They also both had very humanist teachings, which was very new to religions which had previously been almost wholly focused on the "holy other."