/lit/ - Literature

>>22728936
>So you're not looking to make an actual product that can be enjoyed?
Why are you on /lit/ dude hahahaha wtf is this i don't understand? You're a new newfag?

>>22359816
I just re-read it. It really isn't.

Side note: it's impressive how much of an improvement lot 49 is over V.—and look, V. is still one of my all time favorite novels and I wouldn't call 49 one of my favorites, it's more of a compulsive interest that I re-read every year and listen to its audiobook every year too and read all the notes to too (I do this with V. and GR too) thanks for listening I guess. Reading I mean. Whatever. Have you noticed zoomers saying "whenever" for "when"? Does this deserve its own thread? There aren't many usage threads are there...

Did you know if you use the archives and click [View same] on the image you can pinpoint anons' posts? Creepy. Also spare me. Thanks.

>>22330686
based replies

>>22286964

Alright, please and thank you:

https://pastebin.com/raw/tD0QNFUq

Should be at worst worth your time for a laugh

>>20607648
BEE

>>20567884
It doesn't fit the definition of literature.

The class of writings distinguished for beauty of style or expression, as poetry, essays, or history, in distinction from scientific treatises and works which contain positive knowledge; belles-lettres.

HoL is distinguished by its design... design crammed with Lorem Ipsum. Too bad desu, it could have been crammed with literature.

>>20219788
No.

>>20219756
No.

>>20219805
Yes.

>>20219828
This.

>>20219839
No.