/lit/ - Literature

>>20706802
you can't be a fan of 4chan and not like the pynch, it just doesn't add up.

>>20655110
lobster powers!

>>20655116
you're either a shill or something more pathetic

>>16022636

>>14693900
>t. jordan beterson viewer

>>13299993
>right here, bucko

>>12903386
your mom is overrated because fucking her wasnt that good

U /lit fags are all spooked by mass media and pop culture into thinking that high IQ or genius tier people have to be sad, cynical and miserable. Prove me wrong. (you cant).
>i havent read the sticky so to not break any laws what do you think about infinite jest

>>12796266
Jordan Peterson
Stefan Molyneux
Natalie Wynn (she/her pronouns)

>>12712455
>renaissance
>end of """""degeneracy""""
oh shit lmao hahahahahaha do you know anything about the renaissance you fucking retard hahahahahahaha

"Josef Stalin personally murdered 280 billion people with his bare hands and Josef Stalin was a Marxist. Jack Dearida was also a Marxist therefore vis a vis a la Jungian analysis within a Christian context when Jack Deeryda wrote his works on literary interpretation he did it with the intention of personally strangling 320 billion babies to death with famine. P.S. Michelle Fucalt was a sex pervert. SORT YOURSELF OUT AND SLAY YOUR EDIBLE TYRANT BY READING SHOES'N'SCHNITZEL, BUCKO!"

On a serious note, has Peterson ever actually discussed the content of Derrida's or Foucault's arguments? Every video of him talking about them that I've seen has basically been him calling them evil Marxists that are trying to destroy reality and murder everyone.

I see people reading his book on the train so often now. Is he actually worth a read? sorry to add to the nonstop JBP posts but everyone talks about him and not his book. Has anyone actually read it? Is it trash?

*evolutionary psychologizes the FUCK out of /lit/tledicks*