/lit/ - Literature

>>16954623

Kant was BTFO by Guénon (pbuh) and Hindu metaphysics

Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guénon (pbuh) succinctly flays Kant in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others and for wishing to impotently substitute a 'theory of knowledge' for Knowledge itself). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>16953169
Kant was BTFO by Guénon (pbuh) and Hindu metaphysics

Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guénon (pbuh) succinctly flays Kant in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others and for wishing to impotently substitute a 'theory of knowledge' for Knowledge itself). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>15513519
>However, to cloak the fact that none of you can respond to the Kantian critique you cloak yourselves in a false sense of superiority and enlightenment.

That dumb hylic doesn't even know that Kant was BTFO by Guénon (pbuh) and Hindu metaphysics

Kant said that he didn't see how it was possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guénon (pbuh) succinctly flays Kant in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others and for wishing to impotently substitute a 'theory of knowledge' for Knowledge itself). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>15487163

Kant was BTFO by Guénon (pbuh) and Hindu metaphysics

Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guénon (pbuh) succinctly flays Kant in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others and for wishing to impotently substitute a 'theory of knowledge' for Knowledge itself). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>14847678
Kant was BTFO by Guénon (pbuh) and Hindu metaphysics

Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon (pbuh) succinctly flays Kant in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others and for wishing to impotently substitute a 'theory of knowledge' for Knowledge itself). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>14835074
>THis, but dont do it the eastern mystic way.
>Just sit and meditate like Kant did

Kant was BTFO by Guénon (pbuh) and Hindu metaphysics

Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon (pbuh) succinctly flays Kant in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others and for wishing to impotently substitute a 'theory of knowledge' for Knowledge itself). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>14714259
Kant was BTFO by Guénon (pbuh) and Hindu metaphysics

Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon (pbuh) succinctly flays Kant in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others and for wishing to impotently substitute a 'theory of knowledge' for Knowledge itself). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>14643812
Kant was BTFO by Guénon and Hindu metaphysics

>Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon succinctly and accurately flays him in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>14563315
Kant was BTFO by Guenon and Indian metaphysics. Kant thought that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon chastises him in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others and for impotently substituting a theory of knowledge for Knowledge itself). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides an explanation in accordance with Kant's own reasoning for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God who is their inner consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>14563645
Neoplatonism comes very close, although in a few areas it fumbles the ball and it's pretty much a dead school of thought nowadays anyways without any active tradition of practicing it. It's unfortunate really, if they hadn't been squashed by Christian persecution they quite possibly might have managed to eventually refine their system and elevate it to the same heights of perfection as the Indians.

>>14492702
With Guénon, who retroactively refuted Kant. I will demonstrate Guénon's retroactive refutation below.

>Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon succinctly and accurately flays him in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>14471977
Daily reminder that Kant got btfo by Guenon (pbuh) and Hinduism
Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon (pbuh) succinctly and accurately flays him in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

Kant was BTFO by Guénon.

>Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon succinctly and accurately flays him in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

Hume was BTFO by Kant; Kant was BTFO by Guénon.

>Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon succinctly and accurately flays him in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon succinctly and accurately flays him in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

>>14395695
>>14395905
>>14396242
>>14396282
>>14396313
>>14396489
>>14396490
>>14396626
Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon succinctly and accurately flays him in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this.

Kant claimed that it wasn't possible for humans to have intellectual intuition because he couldn't think of how it was possible (Guenon succinctly and accurately flays him in 'Intro to Hindu Doctines' for wishing to impose the limits of his own ignorance upon others). The supreme irony is that Kant himself in his first critique admitted that God would have to have intellectual intuition because otherwise He would be subject to limits which could not be true as any true supreme God is unlimited. As the Upanishads state that God is really the inner Self of all beings it provides the explanation in accordance with Kant's thought for how they can experience intellectual intuition (i.e. it's really God inside their consciousness who has this intuition) but because Kant never left Konigsberg he never had the chance to be initiated into the metaphysical teachings and associated spiritual practices which allow someone to do this