/lit/ - Literature

>>9041939
>N. is a 'hierarchical fictionalist,' and not an emotivist for humanity as whole

you wrote this a bit back, and i am curious: does mcintyre argue this? what is the basis for reading nietzsche as an emotivist?--in your opinion, is there any stock in it?

at first glance, the emotivist argument almost strikes me as a work of historical revisionism. and this reminds me, tangentially: are you familiar with the revisionist attempts at turning figures like plato (see jill king at cornell) and machiavelli (see mary dietz at northwestern) into democrats? if so, do you have an opinion on the matter?