/lit/ - Literature

>>6241173
Because those marriages were based on different premises.

You can't compare relationships based on tribes and clans making alliances, arranging marriages for it's young members to symbolize that, based on the accurate consideration of personalities by the couple's parents and clan elders, where a true love would grow out of the shared labour of building a household and raising a family, and the mutual dependence as the couple got older, with "modern marriage" based on wether two people like to have sex with each other and that goes into the shitter as soon as they get bored of the sex.

And you can't expect women who engage in cocaine fueled orgies with alpha males while they can before settling up with lesser males they will NEVER be able to love because their standards were fucked up by exposure to men at the top of the hierarchy to be able to commit themselves. They have become addicted to their instant gratification, unable to exhibit inhibition and self-control to restrain their primitive urges and natural instincts. Having any kind of long-term relationship or commitment in this context only makes sense if you are a cuckold fetishist who gets off on being cheated on and humiliated.

Same reason why promiscuous and degenerate alpha males are also underepresented.

They have better things to do than writing, and even if they do write, no one is interested in their chronicles of their sexual life.

>What's a rejection of hedonism that doesn't base its arguments on spooks?

Seeing other people having fun makes me uncomfortable, since i can't take part on it.

99% of people already live the Stirnerian lifestyle without ever needing to have heard of him.