/lit/ - Literature

His opening argument is that the difference between good/bad good/evil have become entangled. The good in the first binarism (the wealthy and noble) are the evil in the second. This is because of the negative onologistic nomenclature of the weak (see lambs and eagles). This forces nihilism not so much because it shows the rhetorical structure upon which the world rests, that is Nietzsche for the weak, but that we have forgotten the world is built upon a middle rhetorical structure. This as I said forces a nihilism at its most basic form; the absence of the replacement. It asks the the question which for Nietzsche is the limit of critical philosophy; what now?