/lit/ - Literature

>>6863276
Got the book right here. Read it. It's positive babble. I am not even religious, and I can't stand this new atheist bullshit. Never once do these dolts mention the secular study of religion, there is an entire field dedicated to the study. They never mention it because it doesn't fit their positive agenda.

Not a fan, but them edgy 20 year olds love it I hear.

>>6571714

I got the book right here in my hand anon. I've read it, and I can tell you, next to everything else I've read, the book is complete and utter shit. I've read a Masters Thesis that are more thought provoking.

Anon, I'm just going to assume you are young. Probably in your 20s. Maybe you are new to reading, I don't know, but you might be falling for that "the last thing I read is the greatest thing ever".... don't do that. Read another 2 dozen different books. Even then, there is still more to read.