/lit/ - Literature

>>6705856

You can make a case that men and women age comparably on a purely physical level, but as that's never what the argument is really about, it's a moot point.

What the argument is really about (and what is actually the case) is that women's sexual market value is more closely bound up with their bodies, while men's sexual market value is more spread out among various attributes, including non-corporeal attributes, especially confidence and social status (money helps too, obviously).

And I'm not that other guy, but it goes directly to his point about how female pop-idols lose their marketability as they age. Meanwhile, pic related, a /very/ wrinkly bunch, are literally on tour /right-now/.