/lit/ - Literature

>>15368316
Having oranges in the cold section is retarded anyway, i'd squash those too.

>>15273335
This obsession with "Spreading muh precious genes" seems far more narcissistic to me. Plus the sentiment "I am happy and like living therefore the unborn must also be" seems very ignorant and close minded.
>>15273339
Ok what does it matter? Antinatalist sentiment isn't guaranteed to be inherited by your children. And if you would have them it would implode your own argument. And then they are supposed to have antinatalist grandchildren? I don't get it...
>>15273391
How is it meaningful? It is just subjective feelings. And I know many parents who do not feel that way. Also it is very exploitative. You are damning your children to guaranteed suffering over some supposed feelings of fulfillment in life.
And then your children will have to do the same? It is a ponzy scheme!
Why do so many parents resent their children, abuse and belittle them then?
>loser
Loser how? Nice ad hominem anyway
>>15273407
How is pain is bad an arbitrary axiom?
It is the most realest of all! If you disagree set yourself on fire. Or pour acid on your face.
>>15273430
>If life was actually suffering (it’s only suffering if you’re under extreme circumstances) antinatalists would kill themselves

That is an unfair statement to make and you know it