/lit/ - Literature

>>8605226
How is that any different though? The Ubermench rises above virtue to create his own form of good and evil
>>8605233
What about the initial point does not coincide with what Neitzche writes?
>>8605430
Again another poster saying nothing
>>8606205
Gah what are you talking about? The fact that some of his ideas don't agree with each other doesnt mean there was not an underlying form of what his philosophy represents. The fact that it may be hard to say 'what' Nietzsche believed is complete nonsense, his ideas are clear. Unless you have supplements from texts which disagree with each other to such an extent that he can't be called an existentialist than your point is moot. Even if there are some ideas which don't match its easy to say what he wasn't, and he wasn't opposed to the same ideas of Hitler's justification.
>>8606946
Lel because it was so easy to twist that way


What a surprise another utter vacuum of nonsense on this board. You people are more concerned with name-dropping and ridiculing people who "misunderstand" texts than actually taking the time to understand it yourselves. Someone explain to me how Hitler misunderstood Neitzche, please I'm sitting on the edge of my seat.