/lit/ - Literature

>>17201781
I hope so too
I don't want to suffer any longer

>>17165314
>The question of free will is a fruitless endeavor.
Wrong.
>Whether one has free will or does not have free will, they live their life exactly the same
Whether one thinks that he has free will or doesn't, has MASSIVE consequences for his life.

>>16541125
>Outdated - animal rationality is a developing field in biology. But even the Greeks recognised that dogs use syllogisms.
You've to to be fucking kidding me. This is ridiculous. Animals can't even speak. The chimp studies where they were pressing buttons are a sham. If animals were not retarded NPCs people would have noticed it a long time ago.
>random
It's not.
>objective if they are not also the source of everything else
They're objective because they are transcendental. I.e. independent of human opinion.
>Why aren't they just another subjectivity?
Because they're independent of individual humans, i.e. have higher existence of their own.
>Were they responsible for mathematics?
I don't see why they should be. But they seem analogous to mathematics in many ways.