/lit/ - Literature

>>13562649
Okay, please don't insult Richard Dawkins.

>>9938008
I know you thought that altering that meme was clever, but it's less about feeling 'saved' or "enlightened" and more about acquiring a basic post-teenager level of understanding of the role of the spiritual in an individual's moral development, and of the overwhelmingly positive role that Christianity played in the development of the most successful league of societies on the planet.

>>9884369
>Evidence doesn't exist.
I can't keep up with memeing of this intensity. I shall bow out before I get truly outclassed.

>>9794807
>>9794815
If you are going to be baiting at least try to be humorous and more subtle than:

>"MUH FEEFEES"
>invisible sky-man
>following a moral system because you feel forced

"The only real truths are objective statements about things that exist. The only way to make objective statements about things that exist are through the scientific method."

How would /lit/ respond to this modern sentiment?

What is /lit/'s opinion on the writings of popular scientists like Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins?