/lit/ - Literature

But also containing non-fiction works. And in similar format, NOT a typical reading chart.

But it covered books in general, not only fiction.
By the way, what does /lit/ think of picrel?

Is it a meme or something noteworthy?

Is this chart still accurate? Always thought Camus was too high

How accurate is this?
From the description, level 2 is comfy zone for me. Level 3 excites me.

Discuss.

>>19797274
found one

>>19628955
I go on the wiki and download charts in their entirety and start wherever in there. This is a good one for genre fiction

>>18270625
I was talking about this one
It has a lot more than that chart
This one has mistakes
Some authors should be lower
The labels don't make that much sense
The lack of given names for authors is confusing
But I think it is better than that goodreads article which includes philosophy and fiction books together

There's already a chart.

>>16910846

>>16605917
learn to search for stuff

Well, what is your gameplay level, /lit/?

I always felt this one to be a little inaccurate desu

How accurate is this chart? Do you want to add, remove or change the position of some author.

>>14974345

I mostly read authors on level 3, has any anglos tried reading Pynchon or Joyce? are they really good as /lit/ people praise?

Should this infamous author accessibility chart be updated /lit/?

What does lit think?

>>14236242
He is one of these. But mommy always told me not to give out personal info on the internet.