/lit/ - Literature

>blocks your path
>informs you that your paradigm's presuppositions are circular and lead to contradictions
>casually notes how only Orthodoxy can account for genuine knowledge of Truth
>you protest
>he reaches back to his bookshelf and pulls out a 900 page book with a broken spine and six dozen stickynotes spilling from it
>calls you a doofus for not knowing what ecumenical council #15254 decreed regarding the Energy/Essence distinction and begins rambling about how he used to be a Thomist so he knows all about why naive empiricism fails
what is your next move?

>Guys I created Boomer posting give me credit
He's really solid on theology, so why is he mucking it up with this nonsense?

>the Transcendental Argument proves god
how? he never says, he just says no atheist paradigm can stand up to the Transcendental Argument but the Orthodox paradigm can.

which philosophers deal with the Transcendental Argument, or is it just a religitard meme?

>proves gods existence