/lit/ - Literature

Can we have a Stirner thread, for old times' sake?

Are there any worthwhile critiques of Max Stirner/ egoism that isn’t Marx or addressed in Stirner’s critics?

>Humane consciousness despises both the bourgeois and the worker’s consciousness; because the bourgeois is only outraged at vagabonds (at all who have “no definite employment”) and their “immorality”; the worker is “disgusted” by the idler (“lazybones”) and his “immoral,” because mooching and unsocial, principles. To this the humane liberal replies: The unsettled life of many is only your product, philistine! But that you, proletarian, demand the grind for all, and want to make drudgery universal, is a part of the pack mule life you’ve lived up to now still clinging to you. Certainly you want to ease the drudgery itself by all having to drudge equally hard, but only for this reason, that all may gain leisure to an equal extent. But what are they supposed to do with their leisure? What does your “society” do so that they’ll spend this leisure humanly? It must again leave the leisure gained to egoistic taste, and the very gain that your society promotes falls to the egoist, as the gain of the bourgeoisie, the masterlessness of human beings, could not be filled with human content by the state, and was therefore left to arbitrary choice.

How did one man refute every philosopher before him and still manage to be virtually unknown?

>I am le egoist
>I will treat the Unique and Its Property as my bible
>I will measure all my thoughts and actions by how egoistic they are and conform them accordingly
>I will use the word “spooked” as a stand in for evil
>I will support the current thing
Why are they all like this?

>>21927509
>/lit/ nerds are discussing ethics again

>>21859633
>Amor fati
>Not like other spooks
The sad state of neechfags

>>21746413
Because beauty not being good is a spook

Was he right about philosophers?