/lit/ - Literature

>>4636221
>OpenOffice
>not using Libreoffice

you're hurting me, anon

>>2744201
>steals mentos
>calls hobo voluntarily given food a decadent

mfw i hope this is disingenuous

I remember there was a thread like this every day during the summer...

Deep and edgy's big d(/g)ay out

>>2103447
Per-ooof?

>>2074927
Yeah, well do you know this mysterious experiment that disproved god. i mean i'm an atheist sure, but I'm almost aware that this is a belief of exactly the same value as christian faith. It's simply a requirement of not being a bigot

This thread

>>2054474
This post

>>2048088
Respawns to Lewontin's Fallacy

>Anthropologists generally acknowledge the validity of Edwards' argument, but deny that this means that races are biologically real, since the same statistical argument can be used to argue that almost any geographic population is a biologically distinct "race"

Frankly that's I feel obliged to respond to because it shows this whole Lewontin's Fallacy is a crock of shit. And yes, it was quoted directly from the wikipedia article you linked with a citation. Otherwise, your compassionless appraisal of education and human aspirations was a little hard to stomach and stank of moral stupidity.

>>2048091
I worked in the test fallacy later, bite me seriously, come out with all the fallacies in the fallacy pantheon You won't find any, sorrah.

>>1945964
Not sure you'd know your linguistics well enough to carry this argument on any further...

That they are differently worded is no problem, if I appeal to differance. Read Of Grammatology and you'll understand that because meaning is constantly deferred and thus progressive rather than constative (to a word), that leaves you not much room to cite anything along the lines of cognitive bias (as a origination of this phenomenon).

The first relies on you coming back to me with definitions that diverge in their demarcation of the meaning of the word argument (it's your education we're talking about here not mine). You'll find it tough to get anything too patent...

Based on that we could have a philosophical argument on what the concept of argument means and whether the word has been used correctly both traditionally and currently, but then I expect you to have in depth knowledge of dialectics, modal logic and the epistemic issues surrounding standard logical practice.

tl;dr Basically, I'm hundred steps ahead of you, wherever you turn and this is not a debate you want to be getting into

>>1495022

so it's even shittier than I imagined?

Suicide

>White Noise
>shit

>>707964
>Hot guys
>Hipsters galore