/lit/ - Literature

>>12022356
>>12022373
go read. it's a good book. i can't say this with absolute certainty, b/c i wasn't there, but i am virtually certain that whatever the CCRU tapped into that made all of this possible came out of the cross-pollination of ideas between Uncle Nick and Aunt Sadie. Nick was borrowing from Sadie's xenofeminism to write about capital, and Sadie was borrowing from Nick's turbo-Marxism to write about women and binary code. it was a pretty incandescent collaboration and still bears fruit today. whatever is going on it doesn't come from men, women or machines alone, but from some kind of awesome hybridity.

the co-participation of opposites is what alchemy has been about since Day 1. in our own terminally fucked-out times we keep it pretty raw and real, but that's the twentieth century for you. it left no stones unturned. there are still a lot of things we don't know about the human psyche in that sense.

>acceleration literature needs to have standards, and should not let twitter-tards, trannies and dykes shit out [something seemingly novel, but actually no better than a leftbook meme page's hot take]/acc writing.

disagree. the standards are, Be Interesting. really interesting. interesting enough to make you re-think things. neither the left nor the right has the answers in full. politics is inevitable, but always subordinate to a greater chaos. the only question is whether or not the writing is *good.* once you formalize theory, you change it. that happens on its own tho, it doesn't need curation. that's how ideology begins, with formalization. that process can take care of itself. i'm guilty of it too, of course, moral metaphysics are no doubt this.

but that's the Outside for you. it doesn't admit of a priori standardization.

anyways, that's my own meme hot takes. i'm going to go and read the new Land stuff, catch up with you guys in a bit.