/lit/ - Literature

>>21812558
Bodybuilding is attractive mostly to homos.
Ideal male form is just a little bit fit. Not fat, not thin, not skinnyfat, but simply fit. Fit enough to play a high level football game.
Beckham, Maldini, Marchisio -- all much more attractive than Schwarzenegger, including in the opinion of women.
In the past few decades, beauty standards became more pornographic. Big muscles and asses are the norm now, but I think this mostly applies to the uneducated, slum-dwelling, television-watching, pop-cultured classes. I do not see women of good taste being attracted to strong men, nor do I see men of good taste being attracted to women of ridiculously large asses. Both are attracted to normal levels of fitness.

>>21813015
>Beauty is something reserved to men only. That's the truth.
That's the lie homosexuals tell themselves.
They also have no idea how clear it makes to everyone else that they are evidently gay. If you are a heterosexual man, the beauty of women becomes as obvious as a mathematical proof, even before puberty. As a child I clearly remember being enchanted by young girls, but was very indifferent to boys unless they had something (say, a video game CD) that interested me, and for which I could use them. If any of you had had heterosexual feelings, you would immediately understand -- the skin white as snow, the movements delicate as that of a Debussy flute solo, the mouth little and red like a cherry, everything in woman is organized towards the delicately beautiful, although some of them, of course, can also be rather wild, while others can be both.
Homosexuals like BAP say it's because we are blinded by sexual instinct, and mention the birds as counterexample: we all find the male peacock more attractive. That's true, but birds are not mammals. I do not find the she-wolf less attractive than the wolf. These homosexuals mistake *impressiveness* (size, muscles, etc.) for beauty. The male lion is certainly more impressive than the lioness, but I would not say it is more attractive.
But why go to the animal kingdom? The beauty of females is evident *even in objects*, most famously those which have sumptuous curves like the violin, but also the roses, the white cushions of a comfortable bed, all that is soft and fluid, all that is languid and dreamy, white and red, all that embraces and enfolds. It's the beauty of winds, whispers, and of boughs full of flowers. The beauty of Wagner's forest murmurs, Debussy's faun, and Paul Verlaine's poetry.
There is the male beauty too -- one need only mention the Eroica. But for me it will always be less, much less erotically charged than the feminine.

>I find women attractive, they make me hard. But only men can make my heart race.
Accept who you are. Many great thinkers and poets have been homosexual.