/lit/ - Literature

What is it with Nietzsche fans and being some of the most obnoxious faggots out there?

>>21773336
>genealogy dynamites from the inside but that is an intrinsic characteristic of philosophy
That's my point about DR. The thing is, I believe it is possible for tought to not take a supone position to obliteration. Let me put it on transcendental nietzscheanism (the system of DR):
>any account of thought must be the suicidal charcoal ---ritual gift--- of a totally (and conceptually) different thougth
That is, literally and pace Hegel, dialectics.

But what if thought isn't determined by philosophy? Postmodern theory at its best looked for an alternative to subject oriented thought (OOO doesn't count since it deletion of subjectivity consist in the objectualization of subjectivity).

Postmodernity sounds like a joke to philosophical and scientific standards; but there is a clear line inside plato, kant and deleuze aesthetics that can make the very ground for a transcendental aesthetics that can cope with the philosophical neurosis: THOUGHT IS NOT TIED TO THE OCCIDENTAL GEOTRAUMATIC ACCOUNT OF BEIG: Reality is not determined by Philosophy's intrisic wars. And, as a corolary: SCIENSCE IS NOT AN ENEMY OF THOUGHT, NOR OF CREATIVE AND POST-CULTURE THOUGHT.

I am very curious about this topic. It seems that this is considered the first initiaiton common to many traditions. Many of them seem to require a longish period of preparation, but are there any paths that can get you to experience it directly, even if it is at a great danger of messing it up?