/lit/ - Literature

>>21629358
What's before old English? Do we have any idea what either the Anglo-Saxons or the celts were speaking before the 600s?

>>20309707
With logic and reason? Really? Not only do you have an argument that proves God but also diagrams out the acceptable traditions? Go ahead, everyone here is very excited to read it.

Pic, please circle acceptable good for me.

>>20309736
Yes, it did seem an unfortunate possibility.

>>19595097
Have you read this? At first I thought it was an elaborate joke. But I've been reconsidering that perhaps animism is correct and I should look into OOP more.

>>19471467
>>19471555
I was unimpressed with the "atheists are kinda dumb" argument, but you two are changing my mind. Anon is walking down a hallway and says 'I'm concerned about what's at the end of this hallway.' So your response is 'you are s fool! Why are you thinking about the end of the hallway? We are in the middle of the hallway!' Yes maybe there is nothing, but maybe there is something. You don't know. You can't even prove the chair you are sitting on is real or that other people have minds. You don't really know anything about the world.

What some good books analyzing the trickster god/spirit archetype?