[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.22888567 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22888567

>>22888180
Jay Dyer would destroy both of them.

>> No.22886470 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22886470

>>22886454
>evolutionary
Masonic propaganda
And even if evolution were true (which it isn't) you still are trying to use science as the epistemological justification for your philosophical worldview, which again is begging the question.

>> No.22885898 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22885898

>>22885870
You should read Jay Dyer.

>> No.22862817 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22862817

>>22860660
>right-wing philosophy
Read Jay Dyer.

>> No.22835913 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22835913

>>22834430
Yeah. It's actually pretty obvious once you understand the Transcendental Argument for God (called TAG for short).

>> No.22831318 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22831318

>>22830972
Read this anon

>> No.22825180 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22825180

Jay Dyer >>>>>>>>>>>> Jordan Peterson

>> No.22821568 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22821568

Jay Dyer has a good and very nuanced analysis of Jordan Peterson, talking about what Peterson gets right and what he gets wrong.
Where Peterson is wrong:
>supported the "vaccine" (to be fair I think he said later on it was a mistake)
>supports liberalism
>said that early feminism was good
>approaches the topic of God from a rationalistic post-Enlightenment perspective, where "god" is more like a psychological archetype rather than a metaphysical reality, although maybe Peterson is starting to change his mind on that

>> No.22810164 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22810164

>>22810029

>> No.22530600 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22530600

>>22530528
Your post is ironic because Marxist revolutionism comes out of the same Masonic thought as evolutionary theory.

>> No.22505566 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22505566

>> No.22505449 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 798x1198, Screen-Shot-2022-06-20-at-1.37.05-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22505449

>>22502612

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]