/lit/ - Literature

By this, I mean that if a Unitarian conception of God is true, then that means that God is a singular mode of consciousness with a formalized private language due to His omniscience, with God having access to sensations that are private in the utmost sense. Shouldn’t it be the case that if private languages are impossible as Wittgenstein argues, and God exists, God would *necessarily* have to be multi-personal à la Trinitarianism?

What is the point of philosophy after Kant and Wittgenstein? It seems like all we can do is be silent or become sophists.

Philosophy is like a long and tumultuous journey through metaphysics and epistemology and at the end it just all gets refuted by a single autist.