/lit/ - Literature

>>20299793
Women get fooled once by a guy who deceives her. She starts assuming men are untrustworthy until proven otherwise. It's a valid and viable defensive mechanism. The problem is that the mechanism is valid and viable, not that she has it. If you were to get fooled and taken advantage of that way, what would you do?
>>20299784
Picrel.

>>20068789
>Really bro?
Picrel
>>20068808
>nor condemning a corrupted being to death
And this is where the conversation always devolves, because no matter what version of a biblical God I propose from which author's addition to the work, there's nothing stopping you from couching silly shit like "murder is okay if they're 'corrupted beings'" in obtuse, circular rationale that ultimately just defaults back to, "Bro, really? You lack faith. Treat my beliefs the same way I treat them because I believe in them."
>resentment
A mischaracterization, but one I can understand. To clarify, it's with a mostly annoyed and casual disdain that I see you. What you believe ultimately doesn't affect me insofar as you tend to shit up my favorite place to discuss things with your omnipresent self-reverence. But don't worry. I'll forget you as soon as we're done talking to one another.