/lit/ - Literature

>>17733677
Rousseau, especially if the future dictator is still a kid.
Pic related was a big fan.

Try to defend him using your philosophical knowledge.
>hard mode, do not try to justify his actions by some weird stupid "there are too many people in this world, so killing people is actually good" bullshit logic.

Conscious, ideological anti-intellectualism is the only solution.

>>16734555
In this world you're either an academic or a person who rightfully despises academia. There is no in-between.

>>16380846
>respected academics.
This should be an oxymoron.

Intellectuals and intellectual institutions have failed us and have become an authority working actively against us.
Conscious anti-intellectualism is one of the few forms of genuine rebellion possible in out technological society.

He was right about urbanoids. The truth is, population centers can be better understood as hubs where the winners of capitalism, aka people who are or are destined to become sociopaths, congregate in order to most efficiently exploit outsiders and each other. There can be no industrial anti-capitalism, it is an oxymoron. Uncle Ted was just mad because the university commies MK ULTRA'd him but ultimately a unified Ted-Pot pill is the answer to the capitalist meat grinder. There must be a movement to de-emphasize city living across all cultures.

And even though Cambodia was an ideologically disastrous and violent failure, the city cucks deserved then and deserve it today. Look at how evil cosmopolitans are this very instant. They have the floor to be the faithful stewards of society, but instead they consume at preposterous rates and perpetuate cycles of global abuse that will give your nightmares nightmares. Much of it can be boiled down to will to power and sexual pathology too. Cities corrupt the spirit and are anti-human.

Several years ago, but I've managed to channel it into a conscious form of anti-intellectualism. It's the best route you can take once you've figured that out.

>>14543595
very based, the eternal e-celeb must be dispatched with the rest

Radical anti-intellectualism is the only legitimate position.

>>14339822
The only people that should get it are the intellectuals, ubranites, and their apologists.

>>14310339
>most academics themselves are proletariat
>No, they're not. Most of them are middle class.
>No, they're not. Most of them are unnecessary.
No, they're not. All of them are unnecessary.

Anti-intellectualism is good when it is conscious and radical. In all other manifestations it's nothing more than a sad, yet understandable, resentment.

>>13179633
I can't say I disagree.

>>13140399
The only good leftists are rural and anti-intellectual.

>>13075602
>believing that the "intellectual" is a good or legitimate category

No, I am opposed to intellectuals and intellectualism.

>>12028811
>chinese
>ecology
Try to pick an at least tangentially ecologically minded dictator