/lit/ - Literature

>Full Scale IQ: 102

>Memory IQ: 101
>>VM: 47 / 85
>>EM: 14 / 26

>Verbal IQ: 113
>>V: 22 / 34
>>A: 12 / 27

>Spatial IQ: 124
>>MR: 12 / 17
>>CP: 12 / 18

Doesn't bother me, I use my intuition for everything, I've never been able to understand hard things so I just sit down and play some vidya and tell my mind to find an answer and it gives it to me.

*Ahem*

I think you already know my type.

Master Entp debater here. AMA.

>>16131072
No, he's a moron. In practically every interview he just says "and it shows what it's about to be human, and that's what it's all about!" this lukewarm neoliberal soullessness.

Film is a lazy modern medium, all it has is a cinematography that tricks the instantly gratified into a true, purely human emotion. It's primarily entertainment, and at very best a lower artform. For whatever it is in those moments of its artistic uniqueness, juxtaposed to the older, far nobler arts which we call the "traditional". And whereby a modern European Christian definition of art is given, the fine art of that definition which the Greeks had sort to thunk all of mans creations, in which there was no specific word for the fine of the arts, but it was known as it were intuitively, that a poet could not exist without divine inspiration. Above all film is extremely overrated by midwits who liked to hail it as the "artwork of the future", and it is only a sign of our modern cultural and artistic decline that it is called the medium of the 20th century. It includes so little worth of itself contrasted to the true arts, but it mercilessly steals what it can to bring to the alter. And on this very stone is sacrificed just as mercilessly any work of art before it that it deems possible to use for its lazy mission, as it corrupts it down to its level. The piece is useful for the specificity of the film, and that is that. From the limited potential of film, to its utterly disastrous manifestation as an art-form, developed under jews and lukewarm liberals, paedophiles and sodomites.

Don't get me wrong however, I enjoy good films, but there is always a problem when one assumes it to to be what it is not.

>>16095968
>Think deeper

>>16070955
Film is inherently inferior to Literature.

Film is a lazy modern medium, all it has is a cinematography that tricks the instantly gratified into a true, purely human emotion. It's primarily entertainment, and at very best a lower artform. For whatever it is in those moments of its artistic uniqueness, juxtaposed to the older, far nobler arts which we call the "traditional". And whereby a modern European Christian definition of art is given, the fine art of that definition which the Greeks had sort to thunk all of mans creations, in which there was no specific word for the fine of the arts, but it was known as it were intuitively, that a poet could not exist without divine inspiration. Above all film is extremely overrated by midwits who liked to hail it as the "artwork of the future", and it is only a sign of our modern cultural and artistic decline that it is called the medium of the 20th century. It includes so little worth of itself contrasted to the true arts, but it mercilessly steals what it can to bring to the alter. And on this very stone is sacrificed just as mercilessly any work of art before it that it deems possible to use for its lazy mission, as it corrupts it down to its level. The piece is useful for the specificity of the film, and that is that. From the limited potential of film, to its utterly disastrous manifestation as an art-form, developed under jews and lukewarm liberals, paedophiles and sodomites.

Don't get me wrong however, I enjoy good films, but there is always a problem when one assumes it to to be what it is not.

>>16064906 (OP)
Part Socrates, part Alcibiades(without the gay) and part Empedocles. Along with Montaigne Kierkegaard.

>>16064906
Part Socrates, part Alcibiades(without the gay) and part Empedocles.

>>16039739
Shakespeare you based memer.

This friendliness has been a transvaluation of my contempt for you out of a telelogically recurrent compassion. It all comes in me, and I am the divider. It is a ego trip, but I think it rests not on the ego alone.

>>16024325
cacocôKotpeemal- saureyalgadas funbene
poepmochit'sya!

Can you guess what it is? I consider myself something of a modern Joyce.

How do other types view Entp?

>>15878940
Based genius.

>>15867562
>be

>>15865461
The Mandrake.

t. entp

>>15855047
I'm just glad my strong intuition explains difficult things to me, my immediate memory's comprehension of difficult texts is very low.

But I think that's just called being based.

>hie bothers to spell properly
English teachers just want to scruff out your creativity bro.

No no, I'm not a mediocrity; I'm DIFFERENT. I'm very intelligent and great.

Germany is ancient Greece.

>>15764778
>read fiction
>the protagonist is an ENTP

>>15744894
Militant a-theism always goes back to cowardice.

>>15687864
As the other anon said, it's most certainly sexual and you need to realise that you are in essence now becoming a slave to your desires by wanting to become a woman. Too feminised is modern life in the traditionally and sincerely masculine spheres, and now we find young men also feminised to a mild degree and in worse cases such fantasy's as yours. You must be strong, don't you know you have infinite strength in these ephemeral things? One can always persevere anon.

Men are object-oriented, and in every sense of your existence you are a man, even your wanting to be a woman is masculine. You need to understand that your a male so you don't just "believe it", but of course you factually know it and it immediately informs every part of your existent predominantly subconsciously because of its immediacy. Be a man anon, find a father figure, read Ernest Hemingway, I don't know just you will die by shame and sin, guilted suffering and deceit. Just see what is obviously true, you are NOT a woman, and this is a good thing, you WANT to be a man because men are good. You can appreciate women but you must know that you aren't a woman and you can't actually understand them, furthermore your image of women is a stupid ideal which comes from sexual fantasy's, Men are better than women in everything. Become one of the guys.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0xoKiH8JJM

Pepe is here for the mental health of tranny's.

>>15544360
>Maybe it'll turn out like those guys who made Katawa Shoujo. Though, they had a little bit of a less on the nose name.
It is on the nose, isn't it.

>>15155947
cringe?

>>14941948
>Hesiod, Sophocles/Aeschylus, Wolfram, Mishima.
>Plato, Aristotle, Carlyle, Schopenhauer.