Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2017/01/28: An issue regarding the front page of /jp/ has been fixed. Also, thanks to all who contacted us about sponsorship.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.12742439 [View]
File: 10 KB, 255x198, defeat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12742439

I'm a political fag who used to browse /pol/, /sci/ and /v/. I've read only two books that /lit/ would approve, both by Dostoevsky.

Am I too unqualified to post on this board and contribute? Am I making it worse for you guys because I'm not as literate as you are?

>> No.12512188 [View]
File: 10 KB, 255x198, defeat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12512188

>>12512059
Jesus Christ, anon. 320 pages.

I'd have killed myself around the 100 mark already.

>> No.12388321 [View]
File: 10 KB, 255x198, defeat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12388321

Novels about a character making his horrible life even worse.

>> No.12012825 [View]
File: 9 KB, 255x198, defeat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12012825

I am astonished at the low level of the intellectual discussion on this thread.

What has happened to /lit/?

I am not saying those who repudiate horrible characters are wrong, but the arguments have been horrible.

Calling people incels doesn't make you correct.

Why not point out at the obvious flaws that the characters have?



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]