/lit/ - Literature

>>6628507
how does one achieve equality whilst perpetuating they aren't equal(with safe spaces, segregation, etc)?

What determines when one is "ready"?

You also claim that we must distance ourself from those who act this way towards women, when largely, as a society, we do.

A man saying anything along the lines of le go back 2 the kitchen xDD are quickly dismissed, as our fedora tipping maymay goes. This is a reality. Overtly sexist behavior is met with opposition from almost everybody when coming from a male, yet despite being a movement for equity, this does not happen to women doing the same exact thing. This point is normally countered by appealing to the definition of oppression and that males are oppressors, therefore this hatred is justified. However, for three reasons it is not.
1. Division, further pushing away from equality and assimilation as equals
2. The relationship between males and females is not oppressive. The dynamic of this relationship isn't Oppressor and victim.
3.

Patriarchy isn't an organization, nor is it a movement. Its merely a cultural artifact of prehistory and happenstance, as well as the logical conclusion that within such a short period of time, that equity would show via population and statistics of public positions and who they are held by. I'd honestly say to wait maybe 50+ years and you'll see the fruits of the labor sown by the generations before us.

In what way have they not achieved equality. What is this fight for? Representation amongst private works is not a valid reason because they're private and because of 1st amendment rights. Public positions your free to deride. Private is at the discretion of an individual, history, industry culture, or not. Social issues do not trump constitutional rights.

I ask that as a genuine question. In the western world, where is the fight? It cant be universities, they have much more women than men.

Equal opportunity also means equal responsibility, and this is something I feel many forget to consider. for both sides

The problem is, feminism claims to be about being the antithesis to the thesis that women are dumb, incapable children. However, the so-called "thesis" was wrong, but this antithesis was wrong as well. It's simply not the case that women by and large are capable of independent decision making. Many women do need to be controlled. And it's when you get shit like pic related, that you realize how much many women need a serious master.