[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18995250 [View]
File: 94 KB, 480x700, CfEmCJNWQAIz_ao.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18995250

>>18995093
>>18995133
This has nothing to do with Aquinas, and I don't care if you reject it because it's dogmatic. This pertains to a domain that is alien to any Atheist. Where there is number there is composition and difference. K must be perfectly simple since composition means an X system, and K must not be X, since that would mean another K2 and so on. So K being perfectly simple means that there cannot be another perfectly simple K2 as that would be the same K, since individuation is created by difference and difference by composition. So you see, where there are thousands of Ks or three persons of the trinity, those are all equal in the divine simplicity that is beyond composition, and this is what I mean by "being outside of number".

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]