/lit/ - Literature

>>10343446
Are you contending that he is not a reformist, or that reformism is the "best" political position for a self-proclaimed anarchist?

>>10216357
But you don't own your labor in a capitalist system, according to Marx. The exchange value given it by an employer must always be lesser than its use value, otherwise your employer would not derive a profit from your labor. You are not responding to this criticism by repeatedly and tediously stating that Marxism, like pretty much every other idea, has been taken to a religious extreme.

>right

spooky

>>10025816
>I earned my salary, it's mine.
I steal your wallet, it's mine.

>inb4 """rights"""
Rights are made up by people. They aren't "real" in the same way objects like wallets are. They don't actually make anything yours. They just persuade others not to steal your shit.

This argument is a big part of Stirner. It's also why ancaps acknowledge the need to buy Private™ Police™ Forces™. Ownership is fundamentally about who can defend what. Entities like the state just abstract that away as "property rights" and do the defending for you via police and military. If an ancap claims to believe in property rights, he's either:

(1) Not an anarchist, because he still advocates for the presence of a state.
(2) Doesn't actually believe in property rights, and just memes them to appeal to liberals, but actually wants the mad-max-esque world we see in ancap memes.
(3) Is too stupid to realize property rights only exist in the context of a state, and without enforcement mechanisms, rights of any kind are meaningless.

Stirner is about calling everyone out on their shit, including you. Nothing personnel, kid.

>>9836690
>nations
>formed

>21st century
>nation state at all

wew lad