/lit/ - Literature

*teleports behind you*
*destroys western civilization*

heh nothing personal kid

*teleports behind you*
*destroys western civilization*

heh nothing personal kid

*teleports behind you*
*destroys western civilization*

heh nothing personal kid

*destroys feminism*

Are there any good books that criticize feminism? Ive read Paglia and found her intriguing, but most of the anti-feminism i see is just Jordan Peterson.
Religious lit on it is also acceptable.

ITT: Post pleb filters

*teleports behind you*
*destroys western civilization"

heh nothing personal kid

>teleports behind you
>destroys western civilization

heh nothing personal kid

*teleports behind you*
*destroys western civilization*

heh nothing personal kid

>this triggers the chud

Someone pls

Does Judith Butler think sex is also performative? If so, how would that work? Does she believe that people acting out gender roles over time contributed to biological processes being formed in people's bodies, or does she reject the workings of biological processes in how people perform gender?

I unironically am interested in reading her. What's her most complete book?

>>15014216
>leftists are critical of the system that oppress
Until they get into power themselves, then theyll suck the dick of anyone who gives them money and theyll shit on anyone who threatens their power.
Just look at Butler (and many others, really) and her behaviour during the Avital Ronell debacle. Or Chomsky and his comfy job in MIT.

>Das Ewig-Weibliche
Lmao what a essentialist brainlet.
Faust deserved to rot in hell, he should have stayed volcel like Wagner instead of wanting to see the world and other gay shit.

>gender and sex are just social constructs
>i just happen to be a jewish lesbian who had this idea
isn't her existence a bit self-defeating?

Is she worth reading or is she just a obscurantist sophist with not much to say? Also, what does /lit/ think of her coming to the defence of Avital Ronell?

Why is is to fucking hard for Postmodernists to understand something so simple; that even if there is infinitely many ways to interpret the world, only a very limited number of interpretations are practical/correct.
If a retard like Peterstein can figure this out, how come people on /lit/ still worship Deleuze and Judith Butler, and then call everyone who doesn't agree with their "Infinite Gender Theory" a reactionary incel?

Normally I dont like JP, but he is clearly right on Postmodernism.
How many contemporary Philosophers have written books to Btfo Postmodernism/Neomarxism? Surely it isnt hard, unless people are just afraid of the social repercussions of criticising a worldview like Judith Butler's

Anyone else hate critical theory? It's just walls of opaque masturbatory jargon that refers to itself over and over and has reduced all of philosophy to power structures and nothing more.
All critical theory should be exterminated imho.

>Claims gender is performative
>also supports gender reassignment surgery, even though this implies that there is such a thing as innate biological genders
Why is this cunt taken seriously again?

Someone give me a quick rundown on this woman.

*teleports behind gender norms*
*destroys western civilization*

heh, nothing person kid

>>11237195
>Show me one public figure that claims to represent and defends postmodernism

WOMEN AREN'T REAL
GIVE ME YOUR GENITALS