/lit/ - Literature

>>14508373
>implying the positing of the world in a degree, if correct to do at all, can be anything other than the positing of a value and therefore localised indefinitely on the divine, or the psychological
Physics may allow for our existence, but it would be silly it "IS" our existence. Quality vs quantity is important here.

>>14511507
>implying idealism is the only alternative
Ahh yes, Nietzsche and Heidegger, the famous idealists.

>>14512242
He was using the term to mean human experience you brainlet.

Secondly, you haven't read Jung.

>>14513640
Yes.

>>14383175
Where's the video nigger?

>>14361026
>>14361570
Humans have higher brain functions(all animated beings do really in this sense), we individually apprehend this far further than any machine could without understanding every detail. It is also to a great degree as well as partially so, inborn. The Collective Unconscious as Jung would call it. All this and our natural capability(or undefined specialisation into existence) results in the intuitive function(not in the Jungian sense). And further more we none the less have no basis for understanding our own apprehension of knowledge from the predicate that we can. And -- this all in the modern scientific framework -- let alone having a proof for the predicate itself.

>>13787092
Jesus Christ

>>13773400
>mee-m
>not memm