/lit/ - Literature

>>21198869
Christians are the biggest hypocrites ever. They keep pointing to the atrocities caused by Muslims to feel better about themselves, but any impartial study of Christian history will show they are no better, if not marginally worse. For example, Christian missionaries on a mountain in Travancore (India) burned a sacred ancient tree, which the Hindus would worship, and used it in the construction of their own Christcuck temple. The Christians historically had some bizarre obsession with cutting down or burning trees in name of their beloved Jew (e.g., Donar's Oak and Zoroastrian holy cypresses). I may need to research more of course, and keep in mind, I'm simply doing my best to remain impartial based on trends I've read.
Moreover, the very nature of "industry" may have Protestant origins, and an industry is oriented towards being at war with nature. Industrialization was born from Christianity, and industrialization was the biggest mistake in all history. The very notion of "progress" seems to be behind the destruction of the world.
Also, no matter how much a Christian argues against it, it is very creepy to eat bread and drink wine calling it the flesh and blood of Christ. Are people that brainwashed not to infer this is reenacting cannibalism? I've even read of Catholic "miracles" where the bread temporarily turned in pulsating flesh. The whole tradition is full of blood (atonement) magic and gives off a sense of misery, guilt, and so on. There is no real joy. This is why Christtards come off as being sanctimonious, feeling they have to "guide" the world, but all this has led towards is the failure of industrialization, globalization, and environmental catastrophe on a scale we have never seen before.
All of Abrahamism is trash, but I find Christians to be the most two-faced, passive aggressive, and annoying right now. Muslims, at the very least, are direct with their savagery. There's no veneer of deception from them. You know from the start you're dealing with brutes, and a brute is marginally more preferable than a two-faced sanctimonious schizo who has a strange disdain/disenchantment with nature, latent preferences for cannibalism, and a martyrdom complex.

Also, if anyone wants to help me in my research, can you tell me if Muslims have ever burned or chopped down ancient sacred trees for "idolatry"? I consider such behavior a great offense, moreso than massacring human beings.