/lit/ - Literature

So what happens to the souls of men who lived and died before Christ was born and crucified? What happens to the souls of men who lived and died in parts of the world Christianity never reached?

I just took such a massive fucking shit that I feel light headed now and need to lay down

Who are the most important medieval Christian mystics I should read if I’m interested in the topic?

Is it contradictory to be a Christian and an antisemite? I love Christ but I can’t bring myself to not dislike Jews.

>>19918548
Isn’t his kid a tranny?

>>18804783
you will never be a women

>>17579176
Come back when you have finished it.

>>17326446
i will say it again, literal nothing burger. brother had it and had one day of fever and headache and couldnt taste things for 2 weeks then he was fine. fucking rare flu is all.

repill me on how to write and sell a screenplay

>>17206206
I think the fundamental aspect of the idea is total nonsense. An infinity of time does not imply a repetition of any phenomenon, just as the infinite series of positive integers does not contain a single duplicate. So taking it as a serious metaphysical proposition is absurd, and anyone who does so should be referred to Kant immediately.

As for its self-help use in making you think about joy in your moment-to-moment life, this to me seems like folly and cope. Yes, "joy wants eternity," but so too does "suffering want oblivion," and in the end suffering gets what it wants, while joy loses everything it loves. Nietzsche was smart enough to have been a realist, but he couldnt handle it; he had to invent an artifice in which he could go on living, and in the end the contradictions drove him mad.

>Make two completely on topic threads in a row
>Negligent Janny deletes them the second they pop up

Is this the best we can do /lit/?

>>17168867
More for me!

Hitchin up for another 300 post banger of a thread

We often intuitively assume that intellectual conscience, or rigor, proof, and lack of contradiction, are the way to know truth. But it seems that truths are contextual and subjective, very dependent on approach. Therefore there is not just the one truth, the one intellectual conscience, but rather a multiplicity of truths. All proofs are valid only for their own arbitrary premises, rigor achieves different outcomes based on how it approaches a topic, and truth is not a ladder with some positions higher than others, but something more like a thousand plateaus, where each involves an ascent, but none is necessarily even part of any other.

>>17069773
not him, but kant was a big neet

>>16994945
>>16994898
>>16994839
Yeah big agree, not the biggest fan of it but apparently there's scholarship opportunities and it looks good on a college application, so I think it's worth it.
>>16995032
Yeah, probably just gonna pick a Yeats poem, art hoes will probably best me though.
>>16994134
Noted, and thanks :^)

>>16968181
Hey, more for me!

>>16857098
you

>>16822489
mkultra'd into trannyhood
>you will never be a real woman ted

>irrespective of the fact that

>>16785920
Yes, myself.

>>16728189
Bookerly.

>when all the atheist communists in godspeed and silver mt zion make constant bible refs cause whoa deep

>>16627331
You have roasties, I have frogs. We all have things we like to look at.