/lit/ - Literature

>>22689245
>I'm against useless jobs.
So, you are against 90% of existing jobs.

>we can get rid of jobs like effective managers or financial consultants (ideally, that is)
Native Australians abandoned agriculture and switched back to hunting-gathering, because they had no useless insurance in the face of volatile climate.

A perfect analogy of how a moron is gonna utterly fuck the boundary conditions of a dynamic system, because he is a moron.

>The main point of any company is to produce surplus value
Except that every company's point irl is to perform Veblen's strategical sabotage. But that would be against Marx's gospel, right?

>>20632481
>"access to physical resources"
Are non-physical services physical?

>That is not the same thing as "not knowing its principle"
https://aeon.co/essays/how-economists-rode-maths-to-become-our-era-s-astrologers
People play the "economics" game, because they are oblivious to what ACTUALLY constitutes it. Economy theories reveal it as much as astrology does.
Meaning, it propagates by UNknowing.

>>20530015
>lmao the world runs of child slave labour
You have all technical tools already to avoid it. Most of the jobs are service-sector "bullshit" jobs. And that's fucking why we ain't working for 2-3 hours a day, despite Keynes' predictions of such.

>>18544807
>Power != hierarchy.
Money is quantified power.

>we live in far less hierarchical societies
We live in very hierarchical societies to afford such a huge sphere of services. Jobs exist to make other jobs possible. And that implies chains of managerial subordination.

And these imply >>18544798 more moneys for those who are on top of these chains.