/lit/ - Literature

>>11264308
>are you the same person who was shilling Mulamadhyamakakarika
that was not me
>You don't understand the terms, and have rejected them out of hand.
sure, and you still can't make the effort to explain what they actually mean according to you. i won't deny i could use a better understanding of abrahamic religions but that's not my main goal right now

>Creation and existence
>earthly
seriously? you think the mind is separate from the body too right? for me, you are the one with the limited point of view.
how can this body be anything else other than earthly? how can the world that we experience through the senses (the mind/intellect is another sense by the way, it has the same nature as the touch, the vision, etc) be anything other than earthly? let's not take child tales as absolutes truths, let's take what we have right now right here rather than start conjecturing about some permanent, perfect being ruling the world shall we?