/lit/ - Literature

>>11759689
Congratulations, you caught my hasty misinterpretation, and yet it changes absolutely nothing about my claim that you conveniently missed. I said it thrice. Not once, not twice, three whole times. Here it is again.

"The statements you've made are mostly true but they're not a case for atheism as you somehow think they are. They merely prove how great a struggle it is for the average man to truly question his biases.
And now I ask: what was your father's god? What is your culture's god?"

Stop with your willful ignorance. Work on your understanding of the english lexicon if you can't see the relevance of my words to >>11750227
And I didn't reply to >>11759054, it's pretty easy to see how many replies a post has.