/lit/ - Literature

>>20984264
>I have a dream that one day, we will have a nice, orderly society, where everyone is smart, thoughtful, helpful, friendly, orderly, sexy. Everyone would have sex with everyone else every day in a nice way, there would be no hang ups about it.
/lit/ if we all lived in one place. vgh, what could have been...

>>20104769
Political Sciencebros... Not like this...

>make a post
>immediately see how it could've been written wittier and more persuasive
Imagine publishing a book only to experience the same emotion but scaled to a horrifying degree...

>tfw you could die any second
>tfw your body is a fragile little thing that could be broken and twisted in an infinity of ways by the uncaring world outside
>tfw all your dreams, thoughts, aspirations, plans, are nothing but a fart in the wind
>tfw you could literally just fall down, hit your head, and die instantly
>tfw you can randomly have a stroke and die RIGHT NOW
Books that capture this feel?

Any good books for dealing with the toughness of the world?

>last name ends with an s
it's over for me, any adjective will sound awkward

>have to go on a waiting list to pirate the book i want off archive.org

>>16216937
Yes, there would be inequality; that isn't solved. The idea is that looking at distributive justice in a way the privileges the end state (the relative distribution of goods in society) instead of the pattern (how it got to that state) is misguided, or so Nozick claims. Inequality is okay if it was reached through just interaction. And, presumably this inequality would therefore be just, which is the claim i was picking at in my original post.
I think the general point is that if every exchange is voluntary and beneficial, it doesn't matter if the end state is unequal.
>it's not a bug, it's a feature
as the saying goes.