/lit/ - Literature

>>12688819
Fpbp

>>12678345
This tbqh. While I dislike the difficult style, I get why people take an interest in weirdo philosophers, whether it's Hegel, Lacan, Deleuze, Baudrillard, Derrida or many others (mostly Frenchies). I'm tempted to say that many of their contemporary followers are shit, but not even that isn't really true. Sure you get some "I read Derrida now I can write about my period blood fetish in an obscure way" articles, but most secondary literature isn't like that, at least in philosophy, maybe gender studies and other such disciplines do suffer fron that a lot more. It also depends on the thinker, I found most Deleuzians to be perfectly reasonable. Lacanians as well, surprisingly, even though I disagree with them on a lot. Derrideans tend to be the weird ones, but even they make some great points from time to time.

Tbph I think many are just intimidated by the difficulty of reading post-structuralists due to the prerequisites (history of philosophy in gener, linguistics, anthropology, psychoanalysis, phenomenology, the overall context of France at the time etc.)

>>12605514
been a neet 12 years. i'm never going back. i literally can't, it's impossible.

>>12491206
:^)

>>11976308
enjoy the rest of my day :^)

>>11038167
i'm not doing so hot with my adulthood either. i could be out golfing or building a house or working. nope, just chillin' with the homies on /lit/.

>>11038166
rice and beans are a complete protein. throw some veggies and spices in there, it's enough to keep you alive and healthy. if you're really fancy cook the rice with chicken stock. or better yet just make your own from a whole chicken. seriously i don't know how people can't feed themselves anymore, or go broke buying packaged food.